You are here: Home News items Gibe III Dam: report warns of mass starvation and regional conflict

Gibe III Dam: report warns of mass starvation and regional conflict

In a recently published report, Dr Claudia Carr, of the Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management at the University of California Berkeley, has given a stark warning about the human and environmental consequences of the Gibe III Dam.
Gibe III Dam: report warns of mass starvation and regional conflict

Marco Bassi 2008

Illustrated by a large number of excellent maps, diagrams and photographs, the report contains a wealth of detailed information about the history of the Gibe III project; about the shortcomings of the various social and environmental impact assessments; about the livelihood systems and survival strategies of the peoples of the lower Omo, Ilemi Triangle and northern Lake Turkana region (Nyangatom, Taposa, Dasanach and Turkana); and about the likely devastating impact of the dam and associated irrigation development on these peoples.

ABSTRACT

The multiple impacts of a major hydrodam development project on Ethiopia’s Omo River are examined through a resource use and natural system analysis focused on the half million indigenous people whose lives would be radically changed by the dam’s downstream environmental consequences. The author warns of an impending human rights and ecological catastrophe that is being minimized by the governments of the three nation states that border the Omo and Lake Turkana basins. The very real threat of mass starvation and armed conflict in the border region of Kenya, Ethiopia and South Sudan is attributed to government and development agency inaction and indifference to the impacts of the dam project. Despite ample data to the contrary, development banks, industrial firms and governmental agencies have produced reports and plans that minimize the impacts and exaggerate the benefits. This interdisciplinary report serves as a critique of this process as it examines well funded and ostensibly authoritative studies that use limnological data, biological data, hydrology, and geology to make a case for the dam, while the author expands on the analysis using field data, socioeconomic studies and ecological as well as geological studies to call the wisdom of the project into question. The author has several decades of experience in the area, has published a monograph and articles on the Lower Omo Basin, and is currently engaged in cooperative research within the broader transborder region.

 

 

Document Actions